YE Cheng, ZHENG Ming-guang, HAN Xu, CHEN Song. Comparative Advantages of AP1000 Passive Safety System[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2012, 46(10): 1221-1225. DOI: 10.7538/yzk.2012.46.10.1221
Citation: YE Cheng, ZHENG Ming-guang, HAN Xu, CHEN Song. Comparative Advantages of AP1000 Passive Safety System[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2012, 46(10): 1221-1225. DOI: 10.7538/yzk.2012.46.10.1221

Comparative Advantages of AP1000 Passive Safety System

  • With the increasing need of nuclear power, almost all countries who want to build new nuclear power plant take the generation Ⅲ technology as their first choice. The main reason is that the safety of generation Ⅲ technology has been improved greatly than generation Ⅱand Ⅱ+ technology. The passive safety technology is introduced by AP1000 and it is one of the best in generation Ⅲ technologies. The representative passive containment cooling system of AP1000 and containment spray system of generation Ⅱ nuclear power plant were compared in the paper and analyzed using probabilistic safety assessment method. The reasons of passive safety system possessing comparative advantages were obtained by the concrete calculation.
  • loading

Catalog

    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return