LI Song, ZHANG Yongfa, LIU Lei, CHEN Yuqing, CHEN Ying. Generalized Heterogeneous Resonance Integral Method Based on Particle Swarm OptimizationJ. Atomic Energy Science and Technology. DOI: 10.7538/yzk.2026.youxian.0398
Citation: LI Song, ZHANG Yongfa, LIU Lei, CHEN Yuqing, CHEN Ying. Generalized Heterogeneous Resonance Integral Method Based on Particle Swarm OptimizationJ. Atomic Energy Science and Technology. DOI: 10.7538/yzk.2026.youxian.0398

Generalized Heterogeneous Resonance Integral Method Based on Particle Swarm Optimization

  • Accurate resonance self-shielding treatment is essential for reliable prediction of the effective multiplication factor (keff), power distribution, and safety characteristics of advanced reactor cores. Conventional homogeneous resonance integral (HRI) tables rely on equivalence theory and therefore cannot distinguish the volumetric effect of non-resonant nuclides inside fuel from the leakage effect associated with neutron escape into the moderator. Heterogeneous resonance integral tables generated by the three-phase method (TRI) improve the macroscopic treatment of lattice heterogeneity, but the spatial self-shielding distribution inside a fuel pin cannot be represented completely. This study aims to develop a generalized heterogeneous resonance integral (GRI) method with high accuracy, broad applicability, and unchanged online computational cost. The construction of resonance integrals was reformulated as a high-dimensional optimization problem within a posteriori framework. Instead of expanding the independent variables of the resonance table, the tabulated resonance-integral values were optimized directly under explicit spatial self-shielding constraints, thereby retaining a conventional data structure and interpolation procedure. Forty fixed background cross-section points from 10 to 1010 b were used to represent each resonance group, and the HELIOS-47 group structure, containing 16 resonance groups from 1.855 to 9 118 eV, was adopted. HRIs were used as the initial particle positions, and the corresponding resonance-integral values at the 40 background points were treated as the coordinates of each particle. A benchmark database was generated by a three-phase procedure, with systematic variations in moderator density, lattice size, resonant-nuclide density, and fuel radius. The resulting cases covered loose and tight lattice arrangements and a broad range of background cross sections. Twenty heterogeneous pin-cell problems and one homogeneous problem were included, each heterogeneous fuel pin was divided into 10 equal-volume radial rings. For every candidate particle, subgroup parameters were fitted from the perturbed resonance integrals, and both pin-averaged and ring-dependent effective resonance cross sections were calculated. The fitness was defined as the maximum absolute relative deviation from continuous-energy Monte Carlo reference results over all problems, radial regions, and reaction cross sections. Particle swarm optimization was then performed independently for each resonance group, using 1 000 particles, learning factors of 2.0, a linearly decreasing inertia weight from 0.9 to 0.4, and at most 500 iterations. Convergence was accepted when the fitness reached 1.5% or less. Segev interpolation was applied between tabulated background points, and OpenMC reference solutions were produced with 100 000 particles per cycle and 400 active cycles, keeping the statistical uncertainty of keff below 50 pcm. Numerical verification on VERA single-pin problems 1A-1D and two-dimensional assembly problems 2A-2D demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed GRI. For the single-pin cases, GRI keeps the keff deviation within ±30 pcm across variations in fuel temperature, moderator temperature, and moderator density, whereas the TRI gives deviations of approximately 89-120 pcm and HRI gives errors exceeding 200 pcm. GRI also predicts the radial 238U absorption cross section from the pin center to the periphery within ±1.5%. In contrast, HRI introduces systematic deviations of about 5%-10%, while TRI overestimates the inner-region cross section by approximately 2%-4% and underestimates the outer-region value by about 2%-3%. The maximum root-mean-square deviation among the 16 resonance groups remains below 1%. For the 17×17 PWR assembly cases, GRI limits the keff deviation to −32 to +34 pcm, compared with −157 to +232 pcm for the TRI and −368 to −297 pcm for HRI. This stability indicates good transferability from isolated pins to assembly environments containing center, edge, corner, and poison-adjacent fuel rods. The optimized resonance integrals are obtained offline and therefore introduce no additional online computational complexity. The proposed GRI provides accurate and general resonance data for high-fidelity core neutronics calculations, particularly for advanced fuel lattices with strong intra-pin spatial self-shielding effects.
  • loading

Catalog

    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return