基于随机模拟一致危险性谱的核电厂抗震性能分析

张学明, 闫维明, 何浩祥, 孙运轮, 宋林琳, 陈适才

张学明, 闫维明, 何浩祥, 孙运轮, 宋林琳, 陈适才. 基于随机模拟一致危险性谱的核电厂抗震性能分析[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(8): 1459-1467. DOI: 10.7538/yzk.2017.youxian.0720
引用本文: 张学明, 闫维明, 何浩祥, 孙运轮, 宋林琳, 陈适才. 基于随机模拟一致危险性谱的核电厂抗震性能分析[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(8): 1459-1467. DOI: 10.7538/yzk.2017.youxian.0720
ZHANG Xueming, YAN Weiming, HE Haoxiang, SUN Yunlun, SONG Linlin, CHEN Shicai. Seismic Performance Analysis in Nuclear Power Plant Based on Stochastic Simulation Uniform Hazard Spectrum[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2018, 52(8): 1459-1467. DOI: 10.7538/yzk.2017.youxian.0720
Citation: ZHANG Xueming, YAN Weiming, HE Haoxiang, SUN Yunlun, SONG Linlin, CHEN Shicai. Seismic Performance Analysis in Nuclear Power Plant Based on Stochastic Simulation Uniform Hazard Spectrum[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2018, 52(8): 1459-1467. DOI: 10.7538/yzk.2017.youxian.0720

基于随机模拟一致危险性谱的核电厂抗震性能分析

Seismic Performance Analysis in Nuclear Power Plant Based on Stochastic Simulation Uniform Hazard Spectrum

  • 摘要: 为改善概率地震危险性分析对震源传播特性考虑的不足,提出采用随机模拟与概率地震危险性分析结合的方法,充分考虑反应谱生成中震源机制、传播路径和场地效应等影响,生成更为精确的一致危险性谱。结合核电厂具体场地条件对场地近两千年的历史地震进行模拟,并生成同一超越概率下的一致危险性谱(UHS)。为了比较已有的厂址谱(SL-2)和安评报告中的UHS及美国RG1.60谱所生成的地震动对结构抗震性能的影响,以某核电结构为例,建立三维有限元模型,进行动力时程分析。结果表明:不同反应谱对结构的动力响应差别较大,UHS与SL-2对结构的响应较为接近,且略大于SL-2,但小于美国RG1.60谱。基于随机模拟方法生成的一致危险性谱可为核电厂抗震设计提供参考。

     

    Abstract: In order to consider the propagation characteristics of the source in the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, the method of combining stochastic simulation with probabilistic seismic hazard analysis was proposed, considering the effect of source mechanism, path and site effect, and could get more accurate uniform hazard spectrum (UHS). A method to simulate the historical earthquake in the site-specific of the nuclear power plant (NPP) and develop the UHS with an equal rate of being exceeded was proposed. To compare the NPP seismic performance of different ground motions generated by existing site spectrum (SL-2), the UHS generated by the safety evaluation report and the US RG1.60 spectrum, three-dimensional finite element model was created to dynamic analysis. The results show that the response of different spectra to the structure is quite different. The response of UHS is closer to SL-2 and slightly larger than the SL-2, but UHS is less than US RG1.60 spectrum. The UHS based on stochastic simulation method can provide a reference for the seismic design of NPP.

     

  • [1] 陈厚群,李敏,石玉成. 基于设定地震的重大工程场地设计反应谱的确定方法[J]. 水利学报,2005,36(12):1399-1404.CHEN Houqun, LI Min, SHI Yucheng. Determination of design response spectrum for important structure based on scenario earthquake[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2005, 36(12): 1399-1404(in Chinese).
    [2] Regulatory guide 1.60 Design response spectra for seismic design of nuclear power plants[S]. 2nd ed. Washington D. C.: NRC, 2014.
    [3] Regulatory guide 1.208 Performance-based approach to define the site-specific earthquake ground motion[S]. Washington D. C.: NRC, 2007.
    [4] 章在墉,陈达生. 二滩水电站坝区场地地震危险性分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,1982(3):1-15.ZHANG Zaiyong, CHEN Dasheng. Seismic hazard analysis of Dam Area of Ertan Hydropower Station[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1982(3): 1-15(in Chinese).
    [5] 周克森,吴鹏,王东霞. 地震危险性分析多维不确定性的复合概率模型(Ⅰ):地震活动的非均匀性[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,1991(1):19-29.ZHOU Kesen, WU Peng, WANG Dongxia. A combined probability model for multidimensional uncertainty in seismic hazard analysis: The nonuniformity of seismic activity[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1991(1): 19-29(in Chinese).
    [6] 胡聿贤. 地震安全性评价技术教程[M]. 北京:地震出版社,1999.
    [7] 胡聿贤,张敏政. 缺乏强震观测资料地区地震动参数的估算方法[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,1984(1):1-11.HU Yuxian, ZHANG Minzheng. Estimation method of ground ground motion parameters in earthquake observation data[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1984(1): 1-11(in Chinese).
    [8] 姜慧. 地震动随机模拟方法中的场地效应研究[D]. 北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所,2005.
    [9] ATKINSON G M. Attenuation of strong ground motion in canada from a random vibrarions approach[J]. Bulletin of The Seismological Society of America, 1984, 74(6): 2629-2653.
    [10] ATKINSON G M, BOORE D M. Earthquake fround-motion prediction equations for eastern north America[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2006, 96(6): 2181-2205.
    [11] BOORE D M. Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2003, 160(3-4): 635-676.
    [12] AKI K. Scaling law of seismic spectrum[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1967, 72(4): 1217-1231.
    [13] BOORE D M, di ALESSANDRO C, ABRAHAMSON N A. A generalization of the double corner frequency source spectral model and its use in the SCEC BBP validation exercise[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2014, 104(5): 2387-2398.
    [14] ATKINSON G M, SILVA W. Stochastic modeling of california ground motions[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2000, 90(2): 255-274.
    [15] 吴-健. 设定地震确定方法研究[D]. 北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所,2013.
    [16] ATKINSON G M. Attenuation of strong ground motion in Canada from a random vibrarions approach[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1984, 74(6): 2629-2653.
    [17] ATKINSON G M, BOORE D M. Ground-motion relations for eastern north America[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1995, 85(1): 17-30.
    [18] ATKINSON G M, BOORE D M. The attenuation of Fourier amplitudes for rock sites in eastern north America[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2014, 104(1): 513-528.
    [19] 石玉燕,郑斯华,胡旭辉,等. 山东地区地震动衰减和场地响应的研究[J]. 华南地震,2008(1):92-100.SHI Yuyan, ZHENG Sihua, HU Xuhui, et al. A study on seismic attenuation and site response in Shandong area[J]. South China Journal of Seismology, 2008(1): 92-100(in Chinese).
    [20] BOORE D M. The uses and limitations of the square-root-impedance method for computing site amplification[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2013, 103(4): 2356-2368.
    [21] JOYNER W B, WARRICK R E, FUMAL T E. The effect of quaternary alluvium on strong ground motion in the Coyote Lake, California, earthquake of 1979[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1981, 71(4): 1333-1349.
    [22] CAMPBELL K W, BOORE D M. Evaluation of six NEHRP B/C crustal amplification models proposed for use in western north America[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2016, 106(2): 673-686.
    [23] 朱瑞广. 基于地震动模拟的一致危险性谱与条件均值谱研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2011.
    [24] 蔡寅,林秀娜,穆娟,等. 山东数字地震台站场地响应估算[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,2013(Z3):98-103.CAI Yin, LIN Xiuna, MU Juan, et al. Calculation of site response of digital seismic station in Shandong Province[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 2013(Z3): 98-103(in Chinese).
计量
  • 文章访问数:  258
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  1049
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 刊出日期:  2018-08-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回