反应堆压力容器下降段水-蒸汽CCFL实验与模型研究
Experimental and Modeling Investigation on Steam-water CCFL Phenomena in Reactor Downcomer
-
摘要: 为探究反应堆压力容器下降段在喷放末期冷段安注过程中的水-蒸汽逆流特性，建立下降段逆向流动限制(CCFL)模型，开展了基于压力容器模化本体的下降段CCFL实验研究以及建模分析。通过实验研究获得了不同入口安注水流量、安注水过冷度、堆芯蒸汽流量等条件下的下降段环腔内的安注特性数据，并基于实验数据进行了CCFL建模分析。结果表明，开始发生CCFL的蒸汽无量纲流速与入口安注水无量纲流速呈现正相关，基于无量纲流速建立的模型斜率与入口安注水无量纲流速呈现高度指数关联。本文建立了适用于从不发生CCFL至不完全CCFL，再到完全CCFL的下降段水-蒸汽气液逆流全过程预测模型。
-
关键词:
- 下降段 ,
- 水-蒸汽逆向流动限制 ,
- 逆向流动限制实验
Abstract: Experimental test study was conducted on modeled reactor pressure vessel to investigate the steam-water counter-current flow limitation (CCFL) characteristics in the reactor downcomer during emergency core coolant (ECC) injection through the cold leg. In this study, the reactor pressure vessel of a PWR was scaled by 1∶5.8 using modified linear scaling method. The scaling focuses on the downcomer whose geometry is the same with the actual reactor. The core was simulated by steam generating tubes. ECC was injected through two cold legs and flowed out through a break in another cold leg. The mass flow rate of the inlet ECC, generated steam, penetrated water into the lower vessel, and bypass water and steam was measured. The inlet ECC flow rate was also scaled from actual reactor. ECC experiment data were obtained under different inlet ECC flow rates, subcooling degrees and core steam flow rates. During the experiment, the vessel pressure maintains between 0.2 MPa·abs and 0.6 MPa·abs, and the core steam temperature is within 10 ℃ superheat. Under each test run, the inlet ECC mass flow rate is unchanged, the core steam mass flow rate ranges from small to large corresponding to ECC total penetration to near zero penetration. The experiment results show that the steam condensation fraction increases with inlet water mass flow rate and decreases with core steam mass flow rate. The penetration water dimensionless velocity has a highly linear negative relation with the steam dimensionless velocity after onset of CCFL. CCFL model of Wallis and Kutateladze type was derived from the obtained experiment data. The effect of condensation on the steam flow rate in the downcomer was calculated through an empirical equation. Results show that the CCFL model trend for each inlet ECC mass flow rate is similar. Wallis and Kutateladze type model is capable for every inlet ECC mass flow rate. CCFL model parameter derived from dimensionless velocity has a highly exponential relation with the normalized inlet ECC velocity. In this way, the relations of steam dimensionless velocity and penetrated ECC dimensionless velocity under different inlet ECC mass flow rates could be calculated using one model. The analysis result shows that the mean uncertainties of Wallis and Kutateladze models are about 8.10% and 9.02% in this study. -
-
[1] 邢继. “华龙一号”：能动与非能动相结合的先进压水堆核电厂[M]. 北京：中国原子能出版社，2016. [2] ISSA S A, MACIAN R. A review of CCFL phenomenon[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2011, 38: 1795-1819. [3] YUN B J, CHO H K, EUH D J, et al. Scaling for the ECC bypass phenomena during the LBLOCA reflood phase[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2004, 231: 315-325. [4] BECKNER W D, REYES J, ANDERSON R. Analysis of ECC bypass data[R]. USA: NRC, 1979. [5] ROTHE P H. Technical summary attachment to ECC bypass data, Volume Ⅰ: Review of findings[R]. Germany: Creare Inc, 1979. [6] COLLIER R P, FLANIGAN L J, BISHOP T A, et al. Status report on ECC penetration scaling research[R]. Columbus: Division of Reactor Safety Research, 1979. [7] GARY P A, PAUL C L. Correlations for the penetration of ECC water in a model of a PWR downcomer annulus[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1979, 53: 237-248. [8] DAMERELL P S, SIMONS J W. 2D/3D program work summary report 1345[R]. US: Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1993. [9] DAMERELL P S, SIMONS J W. 2D/3D program work summary report 1346[R]. US: Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1993. [10] GLAESER H. Downcomer and tie plate countercurrent flow in the upper plenum test facility (UPTF)[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1992, 133: 259-283. [11] WALLIS G. Flooding velocities for air and water in vertical tubes[R]. USA: Mc-Graw-Hill, 1961. [12] KIM H, NO H. Assessment of RELAP5/MOD3.2.2 against flooding database in horizontal-to-inclined pipes[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2002, 29(7): 835-850. [13] AZEVEDO C V G, PALMIERI E T, ARONNE I D. Simulation of CCFL experiments in a PWR hot leg geometry with RELAP5/MOD3.3[R]. Brazil: ABEN, 2007. [14] CHO H K, YUN B J, KWON T S, et al. Scaling methodology for the direct ECC bypass during LBLOCA reflood phase with direct vessel injection system: Its development and validation[C]∥Proceedings of ICONE10. Arlington: ASME, 2002. [15] BANKOFF S G, LEE S C. A critical review of the flooding literature[R]. USA: NUREG, 1983.
计量
- 文章访问数: 258
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 275
下载:
