一体化快堆主泵水力部件轻量化技术研究

Research on Lightweight Technology of Hydraulic Components for Integrated Fast Reactor Main Pump

  • 摘要: 为满足我国核能发展和国防科技工业发展要求,以实现国家碳中和及能源安全需求为目标,需全面突破和掌握一体化核能系统的关键技术。一回路主泵作为一体化快堆的重要能动设备,目前虽已实现自主化,但其重量偏重,为提高其经济性,需开展轻量化研究。本文通过中俄主泵结构方案对比分析,明确一体化快堆主泵水力部件轻量化研究的方向,根据一体化快堆主泵的水力设计要求,明确水力部件轻量化优化思路,通过CFD数值模拟方法对不同吸入口数量(10个、6个和4个)的水力性能进行分析比较,根据其分析结果,确定了6个吸入口的水力方案为最终方案,相较于示范快堆的10个吸入口方案,水力部件重量降低约15%,实现了水力部件轻量化的目标。

     

    Abstract: To meet the requirements of our country’s nuclear energy development and defense technology industry development, and to achieve national carbon neutrality and energy security needs, it is necessary to comprehensively break through and master the key technologies of integrated nuclear energy systems. As an important dynamic equipment in integrated fast reactors, the primary circuit main pump has been autonomous, but its weight is too heavy. In order to improve its economy, lightweight research needs to be carried out. Through the comparative analysis of the main pump structural schemes between China and Russia, the main similarities and differences of the two main pumps were identified. Based on the weight differences of the main components, the requirement for lightweight of the hydraulic components of the integrated fast reactor main pump was clarified. According to the hydraulic design requirements of the integrated fast reactor main pump, the optimization idea for lightweight of the hydraulic components was clarified. The hydraulic performance of different numbers of suction ports (10, 6, and 4) was analyzed using CFD numerical simulation methods. On the premise of ensuring that the hydraulic performance meets the requirements, the optimization scheme was determined. According to the CFD analysis results, as the number of suction ports decreases, the hydraulic efficiency gradually decreases, and the weight also decreases accordingly. When the number of suction ports is reduced to 4, the outlet flow field is poor. Since the scheme with 10 suction ports is too heavy, and the scheme with 6 suction ports has a significant weight reduction effect at the cost of slightly sacrificing efficiency, the final design scheme was determined to be the 6-suction-port scheme.

     

/

返回文章
返回